online engineering degree/engineering degree online/online engineering courses/engineering technology online/engineering courses online/engineering technician degree online/online engineering technology/electronic engineering online
As mentioned in
Theses post, Oregon State University published Drake A. Miller's PhD Thesis "
Random Dopants and Low-Frequency Noise Reduction in Deep-Submicron MOSFET Technology". The thesis is quite rich in experimental data os pixel source follower noise. The figure below shows more than order of magnitude variations in 1/f noise across the wafer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b2b5/5b2b5ba306352c605513e63df48c0ccaa4be4157" alt="" |
Noise spectral power plots of 10 devices taken from 10 different locations across the wafer (see inset). |
Any channel doping, such as Vth adjust, significantly increases 1/f and RTS noise:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d530/1d530a06b282c8baea440950a6cbcee588c78041" alt="" |
Box plots of source follower noise power spectrum plots. Red (Dark) boxes are doped devices. Green (Light) boxes are undoped “native” transistors. |
Few Vth adjust splits were measured:
It's not clear why S4 and S7 are not shown, but S1-S3 clearly show noise improvement:
The total read noise histogram clearly demonstrates the advantage of lightly doped source follower:
RTS Statistics shows the same:
online civil engineering technology degree/online electrical engineering degree/online electrical engineering degree abet/online electrical engineering technology degree/online engineering courses/online engineering degree/online engineering technology/online engineering technology degree/online engineering technology degree programs/online mechanical engineering technology degree